Historic Hype Over Global Warming Agreement With China; CO2 vs. Death-by-Pollution
What will China’s emissions be in 2030 by the time China’s cap kicks in? Is this deal worth the accompanied hype?
Hard hitting global and local news
What will China’s emissions be in 2030 by the time China’s cap kicks in? Is this deal worth the accompanied hype?
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota. Please try again later.
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota. Please try again later
Michael Pettis Interview with Lauren Lyster: Decade of Slower Growth for China Here is an interview of Michael Pettis by Lauren Lyster from the Wine Country Conference. Pettis says China faces a decade of slower growth
See the article here: The California Cap passes its first test, barely
November 23rd, 2012 at 7:16 pm Steve Fitzpatrick, I don’t believe science claims to have a good grip on all of the factors you describe. More pertinent to the discussion, back in the late 80s and 90s nobody was talking about those factors when temperatures were rising swiftly, alongside emissions. In fact they said that the response was both quick and expected–even expectable
Solution is Sometimes the Solution to Pollution There has been quite a bit of worry about what happens when the methane hydrates on the Arctic shelf go blooie, but a factor not thought of by many is that since these hydrates are underwater, a fair amount of the methane will never reach the surface, but will first go into solution in the sea water, and later be oxidized to CO 2 , hydrogen carbonate and carbonate ions. The same issue confronts anyone (Ian, Ian Plimer, are you out there), who rants about all of the carbon dioxide coming from underwater volcanoes. In point of fact, you read it here on Rabett Run, that if such volcanoes really were the source of so much CO2, the easy mark would be to go look for acidic plumes in the ocean. Plimer’s hound of the Baskervilles as it were, because they are not found. Biastoch, et al (eleven of them, including Latif, and Wallman at the University of Kiel, have thought about the fate of the methane hydrates, and in an article entitled "Rising Arctic Ocean temperatures cause gas hydrate destabilization and ocean acidification" conclude that the major effect will be a decrease of pH, near the Arctic Ocean coasts. Since the Arctic has and will be warmed considerably, Arctic bottom water temperatures and their future evolution projected by a climate model were analyzed.
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota. Please try again later.