Bunnies Can’t Statistically Prove. . .
Original post: Bunnies Can’t Statistically Prove. . .
Hard hitting global and local news
Original post: Bunnies Can’t Statistically Prove. . .
More: Watts’ argument in reality is that the denialist claim of no warming is wrong
Stakes high, and Decisions urgent. It was a response to problems that came to the fore in the 1980s such as environmental tobacco smoke, HIV/AIDS, acid rain, ozone depletion and, yes, climate change. The observant amongst the bunnies will have noticed that science only has something to say about the first. Values are a question of ethics, stakes economics, and decisions policy. However, the misleading formulation leaves much room for ClimateBall.   The science part is Pre-Normal Science, the stage at which something has been observed, but no one quite knows where it came from, what it means or how to understand it. Science actually has a way of dealing with such situations. The initial flailing about to reach a useful understanding is later used by those who oppose action to obfuscate by insisting that still nothing is known, what is known is wrong, or at best that more research is needed. Oh yes, natural variability.
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota. Please try again later.
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota.
See the original article here: Bernard J Pushes Indur Golkany Down the Elevator Shaft