Another Reason to Close Schools of Communication
Excerpt from: Another Reason to Close Schools of Communication
Hard hitting global and local news
Excerpt from: Another Reason to Close Schools of Communication
Error Over Quota This application is temporarily over its serving quota. Please try again later.
It’s not the usual lopsided intellectual battle we discuss here at Eli’s. Â This is Michael Mann criticizing Nate Silver’s somewhat skeptical take of climate prediction capability in Silver’s new book: It’s not that Nate revealed himself to be a climate change denier; he accepts that human-caused climate change is real, and that it represents a challenge and potential threat.
Willard Tony and Dr. Who Now some, not Eli of course, have had their fun with Willard Tony, but Eli has always been serious and respectful (oh yeah, well this one was early days). OTOH there are, to be sure, problems with his approach, his papers and his all around understanding of what he is doing, many of which surfaced with what Roger Pielke the Elder called the major game changing paper in the history of the world, and Nigel Steve called crap Over at the Weasel’s , Evan Jones is proclaiming that all is well and fixed. Well, young Eli asks, what do you find, and Evan says The City September 2, 7:52 am  4.) We find that Tmean trend for compliant (i.e., Class 12 stations using Leroy 2010 proximity ratings) stations is fully 0.11C lower than that of poorly sited stations (Class 345). This includes consideration for both TOBS and MMTS
Read More: One If By Law Two If By Executive Order
Louis Hooffstetter said…
Assigned Reading Down there in the comments, one of the bunnies, Louise, quotes a comment from Willard Tony’s blog of ill repute which is trying to freep the Lewandowshy poll, to establish once and for all that those who deny human’s having a major effect on climate are not conspiracy junkies WUWT is attempting to replicate the survey, some of the comments are particularly amusing:"the warmists will be discussing this secretly" – wot, you mean a conspiracy?"I won’t be completing the survey. Here’s why. First, I strongly agree with several of the conspiracy theories, (secret services assassinate people – that’s their job) and I don’t want that fact being used to dirty the name of scepticism." – Hmm, again, not a conspiracy believer?"Also, I would note that not all “conspiracy theories†are wrong, and not all conspiracy theorists are whack-jobs
Romney, Obama fiddle while the planet burns The Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) posted a depressing piece on Friday Sept. 7, about Obama and Romney. While the airwaves are full of advertisements about the differences between them, they have one thing in common: Both are "playing games with environmental disaster." Daphne Wysham, fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, says that Obama," — like his Republican opponent — seems to place a higher value on achieving ‘energy independence’ via expanded oil and gas drilling than on action on climate change
Eli Rabett Eli Rabett Eli Rabett is a not quite failed professorial techno-bunny, a chair election from retirement, at a wanna be research university that has a lot to be proud of but has swallowed the Kool-Aid. The students are naive but great and the administrators vary day-to-day between homicidal and delusional. His colleagues are smart, but they have a curious inability to see the holes that they dig for themselves